How epithelioid cell histiocytoma the 1965 treaty continues casting its shadow over japan-south korea relations – the peninsula report

When the treaty of basic relations between japan and the epithelioid cell histiocytoma republic of korea (ROK) was signed in 1965, diplomatic relations were established. This had required years of difficult negotiations about sensitive issues epithelioid cell histiocytoma which had arisen during the two countries’ turbulent history. Among these issues was the problem of war reparations to epithelioid cell histiocytoma victims of the japanese imperial government and territorial disputes.

In october of last year, the south korean supreme court ordered three japanese companies to epithelioid cell histiocytoma pay compensation to wartime forced labourers. Japan objected to the decision, claiming that bilateral agreements override these court decisions. This is happening in a historical period when ROK-japan relations are arguably at their lowest point since 1965. This raises the question of why historical issues, even ones that were supposedly resolved, keep haunting relations between the two east asian countries.

When the normalisation treaty was signed, it ended a long period of tensions. The first south korean president, syngman rhee, was fiercely anti-japanese. His successor, chang myeon, had been politically too weak to normalise relations. Only during the park chung hee presidency was the korean epithelioid cell histiocytoma administration both willing and confident enough to carry out negotiations. The final deal provided korea with a series of loans epithelioid cell histiocytoma and grants from japan for economic cooperation and compensation for epithelioid cell histiocytoma the colonial period but, crucially, not for its individual victims. All unequal treaties imposed on korea before or during 1910 epithelioid cell histiocytoma were declared “null and void” and ethnic koreans who had resided in japan before its epithelioid cell histiocytoma surrender as well as their descendants were guaranteed permanent resident epithelioid cell histiocytoma status by the japanese government. Japan also agreed to return a number of korean artefacts. However, the issue of ownership of tokdo/takeshima was left out of the treaty as no satisfactory epithelioid cell histiocytoma conclusion could be found.

During these negotiations, we can see the two sides planting the seeds of epithelioid cell histiocytoma future problems in resolving historical issues. The first of these was unpopularity. The south korean public had reservations about aspects of the epithelioid cell histiocytoma treaty and demanded 1) apologies for the 1910 annexation, 2) that japanese money received by south korea as compensation be epithelioid cell histiocytoma called “reparations”; and 3) they also voiced their disagreement concerning how the issue of epithelioid cell histiocytoma fishery rights had been handled. In general, the park government was accused of having yielded too much. As for civil society in general, it had no role in the negotiations, effectively cutting it off from the process.

The factors that went into the decision to normalise relations epithelioid cell histiocytoma were varied: park needed foreign currency and a market for korean exports epithelioid cell histiocytoma in order to implementat his economic plans, and japan was a convenient source for both. The japanese, on the other hand, were quite recalcitrant but had to accept negotiations out of epithelioid cell histiocytoma concerns over security. In the tense 1960s, it very much looked like the soviet union was winning epithelioid cell histiocytoma the cold war and president johnson of the united states epithelioid cell histiocytoma was concerned about the state of japan-ROK relations for the future of east asia. As a result, he pressed for normalisation of relations between the two countries.

The role of the united states in east asian international epithelioid cell histiocytoma politics remains important to this day, as seen for example in former president obama’s encouragement of the 2015 deal on the comfort women epithelioid cell histiocytoma issue. It is noticeable, however, that none of these factors had to do with either epithelioid cell histiocytoma country’s population and national discourse being ready to accept normalisation; political maturity to set aside historical issues; or any kind of genuine intention to solve these disputes epithelioid cell histiocytoma for good. Rather, normalisation was achieved to achieve other, short term goals and appease both countries’ american ally.

These issues are still haunting modern east asian politics. The divide between politics and civil society is still very epithelioid cell histiocytoma evident. As tensions between japan and south korea worsen, economic and cultural ties between the two societies have intensified, with the result being that political issues do not mirror epithelioid cell histiocytoma the two societies’ perceptions of each other. The governments of japan and south korea are instead restricted epithelioid cell histiocytoma to listening to the nationalist fringes of their respective political epithelioid cell histiocytoma discourses. Furthermore, the exclusion of civil society and citizens’ organisation from diplomacy has created a situation in which it epithelioid cell histiocytoma is impossible to find entirely satisfactory solutions and to present epithelioid cell histiocytoma a united front in international relations for each country, as within each one a multiplicity of actors pursue different epithelioid cell histiocytoma ends.

Besides the various negative consequences that have resulted from the epithelioid cell histiocytoma treaty, no issue has been as pervasive and controversial as that epithelioid cell histiocytoma of the comfort women. The so-called “comfort women” were women who were forced into sexual slavery by the epithelioid cell histiocytoma japanese imperial army during WWII. They were from various parts of asia, with many coming from korea. In the early 1990’s kim hak sun was the first of these former epithelioid cell histiocytoma comfort women to give public testimony about the crimes that epithelioid cell histiocytoma had been committed against her. A growing movement for the acknowledgement and compensation of these epithelioid cell histiocytoma women followed, prompting japanese chief cabinet secretary yohei kono to make the epithelioid cell histiocytoma kono statement in 1993, in which the coercion of women into sexual slavery was epithelioid cell histiocytoma finally acknowledged.

Japan also established the asia women’s fund to pay reparations to the former comfort women. The japanese government acknowledged its moral, not legal, responsibility for their suffering; prompting a heavy source of criticism from the korean side epithelioid cell histiocytoma till this day. While some of the women accepted the money, others were unsatisfied because it did not come from the epithelioid cell histiocytoma government but had been raised by members of civil society. This was thought to be a way to avoid taking epithelioid cell histiocytoma full responsibility on the part of the japanese government.

Nevertheless, in 2015, japanese prime minister shinzo abe and former south korean president epithelioid cell histiocytoma park geun hye agreed on a settlement for the issue. Japan would provide a lump sum of 10 billion won epithelioid cell histiocytoma ($8.8 million) to the reconciliation and healing foundation in the ROK and epithelioid cell histiocytoma abe would formally apologise. South korea, on the other hand, promised to not raise the issue again in the future epithelioid cell histiocytoma and remove the comfort woman statue erected by activists in epithelioid cell histiocytoma front of the japanese embassy. This proved to be a very unpopular agreement among the epithelioid cell histiocytoma south korean public and many of the comfort women, once again, did not accept the payment made by japan.

The situation worsened when park’s successor, president moon jae in, dissolved the reconciliation and healing foundation. Moon had expressed his opposition to the agreement with japan epithelioid cell histiocytoma in the past and public opinion had turned against the epithelioid cell histiocytoma settlement due to japan’s amends being considered insincere. Japan, however, decried south korea’s lack of adherence to its own promises.

This issue continues to create divisions and is preventing bilateral epithelioid cell histiocytoma relations from improving to new levels. South korean public discourse is too divided to provide a epithelioid cell histiocytoma lasting, conclusive solution to the problem at hand, while japan has to find a difficult balance between making epithelioid cell histiocytoma amends for its past crimes and not appearing to be epithelioid cell histiocytoma yielding too much.

Given the many negative consequences caused by the treaty, some might consider it to have been a mistake. Diplomatic relations have been normalised, but the relationship between seoul and tokyo is far from epithelioid cell histiocytoma friendly. Regarding the comfort women issue, both governments negotiated a deal only to have it rejected epithelioid cell histiocytoma by the south korean public. The historical wounds remain too fresh. Moreover, the issue of solving the comfort women conundrum was tackled epithelioid cell histiocytoma in order to pursue other ends. The breakdown of bilateral relations made security cooperation difficult in epithelioid cell histiocytoma a moment when north korea’s behaviour seemed increasingly erratic. Hence, the two countries had to remove the main obstacle to epithelioid cell histiocytoma security cooperation, also, in part, to address washington’s concerns about east asian security.

Ultimately, however, the treaty cannot be considered a historical mistake. In fact, it has had many positive outcomes; it was economically beneficial for all involved, it provided a framework for diplomatic relations between two previously epithelioid cell histiocytoma hostile countries, and it was a first, though imperfect, attempt at resolving historical issues. Still, the 1965 treaty’s negative consequences continue to be felt to this day epithelioid cell histiocytoma and, as such, emphasise to what extent historical issues remain a significant obstacle epithelioid cell histiocytoma to a cooperative relationship between south korea and japan.

RELATED_POSTS