Fake malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines morality aiia institute

• In November 2019 PragerU conducted an impromptu survey on the malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines campus at UC Berkely, asking students how many genders there are. One young lady stated that there are “72 genders” and began trying to list them. Another student asserted that there are an “infinite number” of genders. Another said: “You can define yourself as whatever you want.” And yet another claimed that gender is just “made up.”

Having rejected God’s Word (Decalogue, teachings of Jesus), we’re now off on a dangerous and impossible search for malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines a viable substitute. But the options are limited. Human convention, social construct, political correctness, and universal acceptance, when posited as the basis for morality, are all doomed from the start. Why? Because they are human-based. What human or select group of humans are all other malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines humans going to authorize to tell us (or maybe even order us!) what to believe and how to behave?

No one person and no group of persons, acting autonomously, on their own self-appointed authority, are in a position to decide what is moral or malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines not moral for all other persons. Why? Because no humans, apart from Divine revelation, have any objective way of even knowing what is moral malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines or not moral. Not even the most ardent self-assured secularists. And some of them, incredibly, seem to now be realizing that.

Something in the air? Really?! It’s my sense that any morality based on a foundation malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines that is floating in the air will soon disappear into malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines thin air. That would be nothing more than an imaginary morality. Fake morality. And it would fall upon its own crumbling foundation. Which is exactly what is happening. Twelve years after saying what he said, Dawkins now seems to be seeing just how baseless and malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines nonviable any such construct really is.

On November 4, 2019, Jonathon Van Maren, posted a blog in which he explained that Dawkins, Bill Mahar, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and other notable secularists, are now evidently realizing how ugly things are becoming due malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines to secularization and the ban on all things Christian. He wrote: “Many optimistic atheists recently believed that once God was dethroned malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines and banished, we could finally live as adults and get on with malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines the utopian project of creating a society based on faith malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines in ourselves.” But that plan doesn’t seem to be turning out as well as projected.

• “There is a very real possibility, [Douglas Murray] noted, that our modern concept of human rights, based as it is on a Judeo-Christian foundation, may very well outlive Christianity by only a few short malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines years. Cut off from the source, our conception of human rights may shrivel and die very malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines quickly, leaving us fumbling about in a thick and impenetrable darkness.”

• “As recently as 2015, Richard Dawkins (author of The God Delusion) was arguing that children needed to be protected from the malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines religious views of their parents, and made a series of alarming comments regarding the rights malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines of parents to educate their children in the tenets of malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines their religious faith. By 2018, however, Dawkins was warning that the ‘benign Christian religion’ might be replaced by something decidedly less benign, and that perhaps we should take a step back to malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines discuss what might happen if the evangelical secularists are successful malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines in destroying or banishing Christianity.”

• “Dawkins’ conversion to the belief that Christianity is good — and perhaps even necessary — for Western civilization to function in harmony is nothing short malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines of mind boggling. Dawkins has been one of secularism’s most intolerant fundamentalists, a man who believed that parents should be denied the malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines right to pass on their faith and that the government malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines should actively side with the godless over the faithful. In a few short years, he is changing his tune. Human beings, he seems to have recognized, cannot be counted on to be automatically good and to malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines operate in the spirit of harmony and solidarity that he malignant fibrous histiocytoma pathology outlines and his fellow New Atheists treasure.”

RELATED POSTS