Abortion pill reversal an unproven treatment offered by crisis pregnancy centers – vox canine cutaneous histiocytoma

Pioneered by an anti-abortion doctor in California, abortion “reversal” involves taking the hormone progesterone after the first dose of canine cutaneous histiocytoma abortion medication. However, reproductive health experts, including the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, say there’s no evidence the procedure actually works to stop an canine cutaneous histiocytoma abortion from happening. And, they warn, no one knows what the side effects might be of canine cutaneous histiocytoma taking progesterone in an effort to reverse abortion medication.

Typically, a medication abortion works like this: The pregnant patient takes a pill, called mifepristone, meant to stop the pregnancy from progressing. Then, up to 48 hours later, the patient takes a second pill, misoprostol, that induces contractions and causes the uterus to empty. Mifepristone has been FDA-approved since 2000, and the procedure works to end a pregnancy about 95-99 percent of the time.

But in 2012, Dr. George Delgado, a family medicine physician in San Diego who identifies as canine cutaneous histiocytoma pro-life, announced that he had developed a method to reverse the canine cutaneous histiocytoma process, according to NPR. If patients changed their minds about the abortion after taking canine cutaneous histiocytoma mifepristone but before taking misoprostol, he said, taking progesterone could help the pregnancy continue.

When his research came to the attention of anti-abortion advocates, states around the country started passing laws requiring doctors to canine cutaneous histiocytoma tell patients that medication abortions could be reversed. The first, Arkansas, passed its law in 2015, and such laws are now on the books in at canine cutaneous histiocytoma least eight states, though courts have blocked enforcement in some. Five states — including Arkansas, which expanded its requirements — have passed laws this year alone, according to HuffPost.

Ohio could become the sixth — the bill passed the state Senate last month and now canine cutaneous histiocytoma heads to the House, where Republicans have a majority. The state’s Republican governor, Mike DeWine, has signed abortion restrictions in the past, including a ban on the procedure after about six weeks’ gestation, which has been blocked in court. Abortion “reversal” isn’t backed up by evidence

But many medical experts say there’s no evidence that progesterone does anything to reverse abortion. In a 2017 statement, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said that Delgado’s 2012 paper, involving just a handful of patients, was “not scientific evidence that progesterone resulted in the continuation of canine cutaneous histiocytoma those pregnancies.”

As the group noted, mifepristone on its own does not always work to end canine cutaneous histiocytoma a pregnancy, with up to half of patients who take mifepristone alone canine cutaneous histiocytoma remaining pregnant. That’s why mifepristone is prescribed with misoprostol to complete an canine cutaneous histiocytoma abortion. So it’s possible that Delgado’s patients who remained pregnant would have done so regardless canine cutaneous histiocytoma of whether they received progesterone.

In addition, Grossman said, it’s not clear from the paper whether patients were informed canine cutaneous histiocytoma that the treatment was experimental. Delgado has not responded to Vox’s request for comment, but he told NPR that before his 2018 paper, he told patients that abortion “reversal” was a “novel treatment.” Now, he says, “we have a substantial amount of data. There is no alternative. And it’s been proven to be safe,” so, “why not give it a chance?”

Moreover, as Grossman noted, the prescription of an unproven treatment to pregnant women has canine cutaneous histiocytoma disturbing echoes in America’s past. “We know that abortion patients are more likely to be canine cutaneous histiocytoma women of color and low-income women,” he said, and these are “populations that have had research performed on them that was canine cutaneous histiocytoma clearly unethical.” For example, in the 19th century, Dr. J. Marion Sims conducted gynecological research, including operations without anesthesia, on enslaved women.

It’s not clear how many people are currently being prescribed canine cutaneous histiocytoma abortion reversal in the United States. But Skop, the AAPLOG chair, believes it is “very common” and says that most “pregnancy resource centers” — facilities that offer counseling with an anti-abortion bent, also called crisis pregnancy centers — offer the procedure. Obria, an anti-abortion group with facilities around the country that recently received canine cutaneous histiocytoma a federal family planning grant from the Trump administration, advertises the procedure on its website.

Meanwhile, one of the biggest questions around abortion reversal is how canine cutaneous histiocytoma many people really want to undo their abortions once they’ve started. Some say the number is significant. “Women do regret their abortions,” said Skop. “I’ve been practicing for 23 years, and I’m also the board chairman of a pregnancy resource center, and we see it frequently.”

However, research shows that most patients are actually quite sure about canine cutaneous histiocytoma their decisions to have an abortion. One recent study found that, on average, abortion patients were as or more sure of their decision canine cutaneous histiocytoma to have an abortion than people facing other medical procedures, such as knee surgery. Another found that 95 percent of abortion patients did not canine cutaneous histiocytoma regret the procedure.

But it’s possible that abortion reversal laws could actually lead to canine cutaneous histiocytoma more regretted abortions. In her affidavit, Eggleston, the North Dakota provider, wrote that abortion reversal laws could encourage people to get canine cutaneous histiocytoma medication abortions before they are ready to do so, by giving them the mistaken impression that the procedure can canine cutaneous histiocytoma be easily reversed if they change their mind.

For Nickerson-Scott, meanwhile, the Ohio bill “just causes more hurdles” in a state where patients already have to go through canine cutaneous histiocytoma a 24-hour waiting period and a total of three doctors’ appointments to complete a medication abortion. Instead, Ohio patients deserve “autonomy over their bodies,” she said. “We have to trust people that they are the expert canine cutaneous histiocytoma of their lives.”